We see a control gap between what artificial intelligence can do and what the evidence supports trusting it to do. A great demo doesn’t prove that a system will stay within the limits of an intended deployment’s goals. The question is: Who gets to decide when the evidence is sufficient to declare AI is safe? […]
AI,
Homepage Wikibon,
NEWS,
The-Latest,
Top Story 1,
Wikibon,
agent,
agentic AI,
AI agent,
AI agent sprawl,
AI alignment,
AI auditing,
AI control gap,
AI governance,
AI regulation,
AI safety,
Appian,
artificial intelligence,
bounded autonomy,
Breaking Analysis,
China AI competition,
David Vellante,
enterprise AI,
generative AI,
human-in-the-loop,
independent oversight,
Matt Calkins,
privileged access management (PAM),
public policy,
Qualitate,
stealth AI,
theCUBE Research
